ABSTRACT Background Young adult survivors of childhood brain tumors (YAS) are at risk for limited health‐related quality of life (HRQOL) and extended dependence on their maternal caregivers during the transition to adulthood. A problem‐solving intervention was adapted to address challenges to family management, self‐management, and HRQOL. Aims To evaluate the acceptability, feasibility, and preliminary efficacy of a problem‐solving intervention (TIPS; Training in Problem‐solving) for condition‐focused maternal caregivers of YAS. Methods Maternal caregivers who screened positive for condition‐focused family management were randomized to TIPS ( n = 26) or Enhanced Usual Care (EUC; n = 27) and completed measures of problem‐solving, family management, YAS self‐management, and caregiver and YAS HRQOL at baseline and post‐intervention (T3)Acceptability and feasibility data were collected at T3 and described. Results Both TIPS and EUC had moderate to high acceptability ratings with higher ratings for TIPS utility in meeting family needs. Feasibility, as measured by retention (70% for TIPS) and limited, minor technical glitches, was supported. Session length was a notable exception for feasibility. The largest between‐group differences were observed in condition management ability, favoring TIPS ( d = −0.85), and condition management effort, favoring TIPS ( d = 0.58). Smaller, yet notable, between group differences were identified for YAS self‐management ( d = 0.44), YAS HRQOL ( d = −0.40), and Parent Mutuality ( d = −0.32) in the hypothesized direction except for YAS self‐management. Conclusions TIPS was highly acceptable and moderately feasible. EUC was also acceptable, but the TIPS group demonstrated improved family management and YAS HRQOL highlighting the role of active intervention for caregivers of YAS. Clinical trials registration NCI Clinical Trials Reporting Program (NCI‐2019‐05353)
Glosser et al. (Sun,) studied this question.