In HFrEF post-AHF patients with HR ≤70 bpm, ≥50% target beta-blocker dose cut composite mortality/HF hospitalization risk by 53% (HR=0.47).
Does beta-blocker dose optimization and heart rate control reduce all-cause mortality or heart failure hospitalization in HFrEF patients discharged after acute heart failure?
1,916 patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and sinus rhythm discharged after acute heart failure (AHF) hospitalization, derived from a larger cohort of 7,351 AHF patients across 47 Korean hospitals. Excluded: ventricular assist devices, restrictive cardiomyopathy, and amyloidosis.
Beta-blocker dose optimization (≥50% of target dose) and heart rate control (≤70 bpm) at discharge
Lower beta-blocker doses (<50% of target dose) and/or higher discharge heart rates (>70 bpm)
Composite of all-cause mortality or heart failure hospitalizationcomposite
Achieving both a discharge heart rate of ≤70 bpm and ≥50% of the target beta-blocker dose significantly reduces the risk of mortality or heart failure hospitalization in HFrEF patients following an acute heart failure episode.
Absolute Event Rate: 0% vs 0%
Abstract Background Beta-blockers (BB) are a cornerstone in the management of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). While guidelines recommend dose up-titration and maintaining heart rates around 70 beats per minute (bpm), their role in acute heart failure (AHF) remains uncertain, particularly in the context of newer therapies such as sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i). This study evaluates the impact of discharge heart rate and BB dose on long-term outcomes in patients discharged after AHF hospitalization. Methods We analyzed data from the KOR-HF III registry, a prospective, multicenter study including 7,351 AHF patients across 47 Korean hospitals (2018–2022). After excluding patients with ventricular assist devices, restrictive cardiomyopathy, and amyloidosis, 1,916 HFrEF patients with sinus rhythm were included. Propensity score matching was performed to adjust for confounders. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause mortality or heart failure hospitalization Results While Kaplan-Meier analysis showed no difference in composite outcomes between heart rate groups, Cox regression analysis revealed a significantly increased risk in the HR 70 bpm group (HR=1.46, 95% CI 1.09-1.96, p=0.01) In patients with HR ≤70 bpm, those receiving ≥50% of the target BB dose had a 53% lower risk of the composite outcome (HR=0.47, 95% CI: 0.25-0.88, p=0.018), reinforcing the importance of dose optimization. In patients with HR 70 bpm, higher BB dose alone was not associated with a significant reduction in adverse outcomes, suggesting that both BB titration and heart rate control should be considered in clinical decision-making rather than focusing on either factor in isolation. Conclusion This study reinforces the established role of BB therapy in improving outcomes in HFrEF and highlights the importance of both dose optimization and heart rate control in post-AHF management. While achieving guideline-directed BB dosing remains beneficial, patients with persistently elevated HR 70 bpm may require additional rate-control strategies to optimize outcomes.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
H Shin
Inspire Institute
D R Kim
Samsung Medical Center
D Hong
Sungkyunkwan University
European Heart Journal
Sungkyunkwan University
Samsung Medical Center
Seoul National University Hospital
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Shin et al. (Sat,) reported a other. In HFrEF post-AHF patients with HR ≤70 bpm, ≥50% target beta-blocker dose cut composite mortality/HF hospitalization risk by 53% (HR=0.47).
synapsesocial.com/papers/698828cb0fc35cd7a88489fc — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehaf784.972