Green hydrogen production is a fundamental component of the sustainable energy transition; however, the success of such projects largely depends on the strategic selection of reliable and sustainable equipment suppliers. Supplier selection plays a critical role in aligning operational performance with long-term objectives, including technological competitiveness, environmental sustainability, and societal acceptance. Nevertheless, conventional multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) approaches remain insufficient in adequately capturing the uncertainty, subjectivity, and group decision-making dynamics inherent in real-world supplier evaluation processes. To address this gap, this study proposes a group decision-making supported Spherical Fuzzy TOPSIS (SF-TOPSIS) framework for selecting sustainable green hydrogen production equipment suppliers. Within the model, ten evaluation criteria covering technical, economic, environmental, and social dimensions are defined to ensure alignment between supplier selection decisions and the strategic orientation of the business unit. The empirical findings, based on aggregated global fuzzy weights and relative closeness values, indicate that technical criteria such as electrolyzer efficiency and technical competence (C1), hydrogen safety (C2), and system robustness (C3) are decisive in the evaluation process. Moreover, the social criterion representing local supplier contribution and societal acceptance (C9) has been identified as playing a critical role, highlighting the increasing importance of social legitimacy and regional integration in sustainable hydrogen investments. These findings are derived directly from the model’s quantitative outputs, without relying on prior assumptions, reflecting the strategic significance of the criteria for operational reliability and long-term sustainability. The primary methodological contribution of this study lies in the development of a spherical fuzzy group decision-making framework capable of addressing multidimensional uncertainties across technical, economic, environmental, and social dimensions. This framework provides decision-makers with a reliable, systematic ranking tool for selecting sustainable hydrogen production equipment suppliers under complex uncertainty. From a practical perspective, the proposed model enables stakeholders to quantitatively assess trade-offs between technological performance and socio-economic impacts and serves as a guiding tool for strategic decision-making.
Müslüm Öztürk (Sun,) studied this question.