The deep formations (burial depth: 3500–4000 m) in the northern Luzhou Block boast favorable geological conditions for shale gas accumulation. However, field development is hindered by the frequent casing deformation of shale gas wells and significant variations in single-well productivity. These issues severely restrict the efficient development of shale gas resources. Existing studies mainly focus on the identification and optimization of geo-engineering dual sweet spots, but few have established a systematic and comprehensive evaluation system from the perspective of engineering risk prevention and control. Based on traditional research on geo-engineering dual sweet spots, this study integrates engineering risk factors. It innovatively establishes a geo-engineering dual sweet spot evaluation system that incorporates engineering risks. Four key evaluation indicators for shale matrix geo-engineering sweet spots are selected: the continuous thickness of a Class I reservoir, the structural location, the fault scale, and natural fracture characteristics. Accordingly, shale matrix geo-engineering sweet spots are classified into three categories: Class I-A Area, Class I-B Area, and Class II Area. Meanwhile, three key indicators affecting fault slip—the angle between fractures and the maximum horizontal in situ stress direction, fracture dip angle, and friction coefficient—are optimized to establish the fault slip risk evaluation criteria. Combined with the distribution characteristics of slip faults, the engineering risks are divided into three levels: high, medium, and low. Finally, by coupling the geo-engineering sweet spots of a shale matrix with engineering risk zones, the geo-engineering sweet spots of shale reservoirs in the study area are classified into four categories (I, II, III, IV).
LIU et al. (Mon,) studied this question.