In the context of accelerating urbanization, university students face mounting academic stress and increasingly severe psychological health challenges. University blue-green spaces are critical environments for fostering restorative experiences. They highlight the urgent need for targeted strategies to enhance their restorative potential. This study used three universities in Guangzhou as case studies, based on image collection and deep learning-based semantic segmentation methods, and employed the Perceived Restorativeness Scale (PRS) and Restoration Outcome Scale (ROS) to explore the hypothesized pathways and threshold characteristics through which visual elements of blue-green spaces are associated with university students’ psychological restoration within everyday campus environments. The results indicate: (1) the restorative effects of different space types follow a clear gradient: waterfront spaces > planar vegetation spaces > linear vegetation spaces > point vegetation spaces; (2) perceived restorativeness acts as a key mediator between visual elements and psychological restoration. The mediating pathways vary across space types. Waterfront spaces show polarized effects. Planar vegetation spaces rely on a dual pathway of being away and compatibility, supplemented by a secondary role of fascination. Linear vegetation spaces exhibit complex pathway patterns in which multidimensional positive support coexists with both positive and negative influences; (3) several visual elements display nonlinear threshold effects. This study deepens the understanding of the “environment–perception–psychology” pathway in the context of sustainable campus environments. It also proposes a three-level optimization framework (macro–meso–micro) that provides empirical references for evidence-informed planning and design of university blue-green spaces, with potential implications for sustainable campus environments and student well-being.
Guo et al. (Mon,) studied this question.