Abstract This article theorizes when and why governments negotiate peace with pro-government militias (PGMs) or “pro-state” paramilitary groups. I argue that negotiations with PGMs are more likely to occur when PGM activities become costly and when domestic and international pressure to account for PGM violence mounts on both sides. While governments support (even if tacitly) PGMs for short-term advantages in counterinsurgency, PGMs often pursue their own agendas and can end up harming state interests, resulting in a shift from support to curtailing PGM activity. I build this argument drawing on examples from around the world and providing initial evidence from the Colombian government’s negotiated agreements with the Autodefensas Unidas de Colombia (AUC) in Santa Fe de Ralito in 2003–2005.
Andrew Thomson (Thu,) studied this question.