In “An Anatomy of AI Criticism,” the author recounts an experiment in which he tasked the Large Language Model Claude with writing a book on how AI can improve human lives. Through a close reading of the resulting manuscript, the essay critiques the model's output not merely as information, but as a distinct aesthetic object. The analysis highlights Claude’s “anodyne optimism,” its reliance on corporate management rhetoric, and the eventual “glitching” of its prose into jargon-filled abstraction as the context window expanded. Ultimately, the essay argues that to understand AI, we must look past the binary of utopianism and doom to analyze the specific, alien “stupidity” and style of the machine itself.
Jacob Potash (Sun,) studied this question.