Abstract This article examines the evolution of Mongolian political culture and its relationship to foreign policy across nine centuries, from the rise of the Mongol Empire to the contemporary democratic era. It argues that Mongolia’s political identity has been shaped by a dynamic interplay of continuity and transformation, in which nomadic traditions, Buddhist spirituality, and the symbolic legacy of Chinggis Khan have endured despite periods of imperial domination, socialist authoritarianism, and democratic transition. Drawing on comparative political culture theory, the study situates Mongolia within broader debates on how cultural orientations influence governance and international behavior. The analysis traces four major phases: the imperial codification of authority and law under the Mongol Empire; the fusion of Buddhist and secular power during fragmentation and Qing rule; the imposition of Marxist-Leninist structures in the twentieth century; and the democratic reforms and global integration since 1990. Throughout these phases, Mongolia’s buffer position between Russia and China has amplified the significance of political culture in shaping foreign policy choices, while “Third Neighbor” diplomacy has expanded its external engagements. Methodologically, the article employs historical-comparative and historical-genetic approaches, synthesizing primary legal documents, constitutional frameworks, and scholarship from Mongolian, Russian, and international sources. The findings demonstrate that Mongolia’s political culture is best characterized as hybrid – blending steppe traditions with modern democratic practices – and that this hybridity underpins both domestic resilience and foreign policy adaptability. By highlighting the cultural foundations of Mongolia’s external orientation, the study contributes to a deeper understanding of how small states leverage historical legacies to navigate geopolitical pressures and assert agency in the international system.
Khomushku et al. (Mon,) studied this question.