Antiperovskite solid electrolytes are an emerging class of lithium‐ion conductors distinguished by their unusually low melting points, enabling scalable, low‐temperature processing routes not accessible to most solid electrolytes. In this work, we synthesize phase‐pure chloride (Cl), bromide (Br), and mixed halide (ClBr) variants of antiperovskites and investigate their ionic conductivities in both powder and hot‐pressed forms. Hot pressing significantly enhances conductivity across all compositions, while energy‐dispersive X‐ray spectroscopy (EDS) of the mixed halide system reveals halide surface migration during densification. We further investigate the melt‐infiltration behavior of these electrolytes into substrates relevant to solid‐state battery architectures, including Al and Cu current collectors, conventional NMC and LFP cathodes, and a foamed NMC cathode with a highly porous architecture. The foamed cathode enables deep and uniform electrolyte penetration, highlighting the role of electrode architecture in facilitating melt infiltration. Across all substrates, electrolyte halide chemistry strongly influences wetting behavior, penetration depth, and resulting microstructural morphology. Together, these results establish clear processing–structure relationships for melt‐infiltrated antiperovskite solid electrolytes and demonstrate how electrolyte chemistry and electrode architecture govern interfacial morphology during integration, providing practical guidelines for processing and structural design in solid‐state battery systems.
Dixit et al. (Tue,) studied this question.