Abstract Background The GRANT score is one of the prognostic models recommended by international guidelines to refine recurrence risk stratification in patients with surgically treated renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and integrates age, tumor size, grade, and nodal status. In this study, we aimed to validate the GRANT score within the ECOG-ACRIN EA8143 PROSPER prospective trial. Methods We conducted a validation analysis of the GRANT score within the phase III randomized EA8143 PROSPER study of perioperative nivolumab in surgically treated RCC. Patients were classified into two risk groups, favorable (0–1 risk factors) vs unfavorable (2–4 risk factors). Relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Model discrimination were evaluated using Harrell’s C-index. Results Among 714 patients included, 58.3% were favorable and 41.7% unfavorable based on the GRANT score. Patients in the favorable group had a significantly longer median RFS (61.1 vs 36.9 months; HR: 0.36, 95%CI: 0.27–0.48, p 0.001) and OS (median not reached, HR: 0.25, 95%CI: 0.15–0.42, p 0.001) compared to patients in the unfavorable group. The c-index was 0.63 and 0.66 for RFS and OS, respectively. A better prognostic performance was observed among non-clear cell RCC for both RFS (HR: 0.13, 95%CI: 0.05–0.33, p 0.001; c-index: 0.74) and OS (HR: 0.14, 95%CI: 0.04–0.50, p 0.001; c-index 0.74). Conclusions The GRANT score was prospectively validated in the PROSPER study, demonstrating prognostic value for both RFS and OS, especially in non-clear RCC, further supporting its use in clinical practice.
Buti et al. (Sat,) studied this question.