MountPat-based XFE framework achieved classification accuracies ranging from 76.36% to 98.88% across six diverse EEG datasets under rigorous subject-independent validation demonstrating strong generalization.
Six publicly available EEG datasets (TMPD, STEW, MAT, Psychosis, Stress, Artifact) comprising a total of 19,358 EEG signal segments from various cognitive, clinical, and artifact conditions.
MountPat-based explainable feature engineering (XFE) framework using cumulative weighted iterative neighborhood component analysis (CWNCA), t-algorithm-based k-nearest neighbors (tkNN), and Directed Lobish (DLob) XAI method.
Classification accuracy under subject-independent (LOSO) validation and sample-wise tenfold cross-validation.
The MountPat-based XFE framework provides an effective, computationally efficient, and explainable feature-extraction approach for multichannel EEG signal processing.
Abstract To extract information from the brain, the most cost-effective method is electroencephalography (EEG) signal acquisition. Therefore, many researchers have used EEG signals to capture brain activity. EEG signals are complex; hence, computer-aided models—especially machine learning (ML)—are generally employed to interpret them. The primary objective of this research is to demonstrate the feature-extraction capability of a new, novel method. The proposed feature-extraction approach employs a deterministic feature-engineering transformation, designed to restructure multi-strided signal representations through fixed linear operations. The resulting transformation graph exhibits a mountain-like structure; therefore, we term the model MountPat. To evaluate MountPat’s performance, we present an explainable feature engineering (XFE) model with four main phases. In the first phase, we extract informative features using MountPat. In the second phase, we select the most informative features using cumulative weighted iterative neighborhood component analysis (CWNCA). In the third phase, we generate classification results by applying t-algorithm-based k-nearest neighbors (tkNN). In the fourth phase, we extract explainable insights from the EEG signals using the Directed Lobish (DLob) explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) method. To demonstrate the general classification ability of the MountPat-based XFE framework, we use six EEG datasets. Under rigorous subject-independent (LOSO) validation, the model achieves 76.36%–98.88% accuracy, demonstrating strong cross-subject generalization. Sample-wise tenfold CV results exceed 89% on all six datasets. Moreover, by deploying the DLob XAI method, we generate interpretable results for each dataset. These results clearly illustrate that the MountPat-based XFE framework is an effective feature-extraction approach for multichannel signal processing.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
İnce et al. (Sat,) conducted a other in Adults and subjects with diverse EEG recordings for various cognitive, clinical, emotional, and artifact-related brain states including mental performance tasks, psychosis, stress, and EEG artifact detection (n=20,252). MountPat-based explainable feature engineering (XFE) framework including MountTrans feature extraction, CWINCA feature selection, tkNN classification, DLob explainable AI vs. Not a controlled comparison; classification performance evaluated per dataset was evaluated on Classification accuracy on six EEG datasets under subject-independent leave-one-subject-out (LOSO) validation. MountPat-based XFE framework achieved classification accuracies ranging from 76.36% to 98.88% across six diverse EEG datasets under rigorous subject-independent validation demonstrating strong generalization.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69994c01873532290d02027f — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11571-026-10421-7
Uğur İnce
Fırat University
Ömer Faruk Göktaş
Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University
Ilknur Sercek
Fırat University
Cognitive Neurodynamics
University of Southern Queensland
Fırat University
Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: