Early wildfire smoke detection is critical for preventing small ignitions from escalating into large-scale fires, yet early-stage smoke plumes are often faint, low-contrast, and spatially small. When full-resolution frames are resized to satisfy fixed-input detector architectures and enable efficient batched GPU inference, these subtle cues are further diminished, leading to missed detections and unreliable scores near deployment thresholds. Existing remedies such as multi-scale inference, slicing/tiling, or super-resolution could improve sensitivity, but typically incur substantial overhead from multiple forward passes or added network components, limiting real-time use on resource-constrained platforms. To mitigate these challenges, we propose a composite multi-resolution detection framework that improves sensitivity to small smoke regions while maintaining single-pass inference. Motivated by the fact that most operational wildfire monitoring systems rely on Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) platforms and mountain-top Closed-Circuit Television (CCTV) systems surveillance, their wide-field imagery typically contains a large sky region above the horizon where early smoke is most likely to first become visible. Accordingly, crop placement is guided by a skyline prior that prioritizes this high-probability sky band while retaining the remaining scene for global context. A dynamic compositing stage stacks a global view with a high-resolution, sky-aligned band into a standard square detector input, preserving context with minimal added cost. Detections from the two views are reconciled via coordinate restoration and non-maximum suppression. For deployment, a lightweight second-stage classifier selectively re-evaluates low-confidence detections to stabilize decisions near a fixed operating threshold without retraining the detector. Compared to the baseline detector, our approach improves detection performance on the Early Smoke dataset, achieving gains of +4.6 percentage points in AP @0.5:0.95, +3.4 percentage points in AP @0.5, +2.9 percentage points in precision, +5.3 percentage points in recall, and +4.3 percentage points in F1-score.
Jung et al. (Thu,) studied this question.