This study reinterprets the two phases of Wittgenstein’s philosophy within the context of philosophical counseling and proposes a methodological model for counseling practice. In the Tractatus, the attempt to draw limits to language and to the articulation of thought renders visible the distinction between “what can be said” and “what can only be shown,” while also clarifying the status of what does not fit into language within the ethical, aesthetic, and existential domain. The call to “remain silent about what cannot be spoken” can be operationalized in counseling as both an epistemic and an ethical principle of limitation. In the later Wittgenstein, philosophical problems are approached as conceptual confusions arising from the misleading use of language; accordingly, their resolution consists not in producing explanations, but in an activity of clarification that disperses philosophical “bewitchment” by describing the actual use of language. In this direction, the present study centers on the idea that meaning is grounded not in a mental accompaniment but in use, and on this basis conceptualizes philosophical counseling as a form of conceptual therapy that operates through the description of language-games. The emphasis that “the aim of philosophy is the logical clarification of thoughts; philosophy is an activity; a philosophical work consists of elucidations” constitutes the methodological core of the proposed model.
Nebile EROĞUL (Fri,) studied this question.