This paper takes a hard look at the leadership and management realities within the Bangladeshi healthcare system, which is currently at a crossroads. The main goal of our study was to really dig into how different leadership styles in both the public and private sectors are actually affecting the ground, specifically looking at the barriers that prevent local managers from making quick decisions and how this ultimately impacts patients. For the methodology, we didn't conduct new interviews; instead, we conducted a deep dive into secondary data, drawing on peer-reviewed papers and MOHFW reports from the last 10 years to identify trends. What we found was a pretty big Centralization Paradox-basically, Dhaka holds all the power, leaving local hospital directors feeling they can’t even fix basic problems without permission. We also found a massive training gap because we keep putting top doctors into management roles without providing them with any actual administrative training. The findings also show that while private hospitals are efficient, their profit-driven models are making healthcare unaffordable for the average family. To meet its health goals by 2030, the government needs to move away from this old-fashioned bureaucratic culture, break up the budget, and hire professional managers. To put it simply, we're saying that giving a broken system more money won't help.
Salem et al. (Sat,) studied this question.