This paper directly addresses the core contradiction of modern physics—the "vacuum energy catastrophe", which refers to the conflict of up to 120 orders of magnitude between the enormous vacuum energy predicted by quantum field theory and the tiny observed dark energy. The paper points out that the root cause of this contradiction lies in the old paradigm that regards spacetime as a passive "container". To this end, we propose the "Instantaneous Teleportation network" theory as a fundamental paradigm shift. This theory argues that the basic reality of the cosmos is not classical spacetime and matter, but a globally instantaneously connected relational network. Classical spacetime, distance, and even time are all emergent phenomena of this underlying network on a macroscopic scale, a view that resonates deeply with cutting-edge ideas such as the background independence of loop quantum gravity and the ER=EPR conjecture. Based on this new paradigm, the paper achieves two key progresses: First, the nature of dark energy obtains a mechanistic explanation—it is reinterpreted as the "topological maintenance energy" generated by the basic relational network of the cosmos to maintain its global connectivity, and its equation of state (w = -1) is an inevitable derivation of the inherent logic of the theory. Second, the vacuum energy catastrophe is resolved—the old contradiction is revealed as a "category mistake": the quantum field theory calculates the microscopic fluctuation energy attached to the "container" assumption, while the observed dark energy corresponds to the macroscopic structural energy of the entire network; the two are essentially different and incomparable. This study transforms the root cause of the accelerated cosmic expansion from a numerically bizarre mystery into an understandable geometric and topological property, providing a new relational perspective for understanding the ultimate nature of spacetime and matter.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Lei Ding
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Lei Ding (Sat,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/699ba07072792ae9fd86ff4e — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18718375
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: