In AF patients on apixaban or rivaroxaban, concomitant use of diltiazem raised serious bleeding risk by 5.4 per 1000 person-years versus metoprolol.
Does concomitant use of diltiazem compared with metoprolol increase the risk of serious bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation receiving apixaban or rivaroxaban?
Concomitant use of diltiazem with apixaban or rivaroxaban in patients with atrial fibrillation significantly increases the risk of serious bleeding requiring hospitalization compared to metoprolol.
Absolute Event Rate: 0% vs 0%
BACKGROUND: Diltiazem is a potent inhibitor of cytochrome P450 3A4 and P-glycoprotein substrates, which can affect the metabolic pathways of factor Xa inhibitors, predisposing patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) to serious bleeding complications. OBJECTIVE: To compare the risk for bleeding among patients with AF who used apixaban or rivaroxaban in combination with diltiazem compared with metoprolol. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort active comparator study. SETTING: U.S. administrative health care database. PATIENTS: Persons with AF. INTERVENTION: Use of apixaban or rivaroxaban with diltiazem or metoprolol. MEASUREMENTS: The primary study outcome was a composite of serious bleeding events leading to hospitalization. Secondary study outcomes included composites of stroke or systemic embolism. Diltiazem was stratified by high dose (>120 mg/d) and low dose (≤120 mg/d). Propensity score matching was used to adjust for differences between diltiazem and metoprolol users. RESULTS: In the matched cohort of patients with AF, 23 000 were users of diltiazem and 23 000 were users of metoprolol. After propensity score matching, diltiazem (vs. metoprolol) was associated with a higher risk for bleeding events (rate difference RD, 5.4 95% CI, 1.2 to 9.6 per 1000 person-years). The risk for bleeding increased with high- versus low-dose diltiazem (high dose: RD, 9.2 CI, 2.7 to 15.7; low dose: RD, 2.6 CI, 0.5 to 8.0). The estimated 12- and 6-month risk differences between diltiazem and metoprolol were 0.48 percentage points (CI, 0.09 to 0.83 percentage points) and 0.31 percentage points (CI, 0.04 to 0.58 percentage points), respectively. LIMITATION: Residual confounding. CONCLUSION: In commercially insured patients with AF receiving apixaban or rivaroxaban, the use of diltiazem was associated with an increased risk for serious bleeding complications when compared with metoprolol. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.
Li et al. (Mon,) reported a other. In AF patients on apixaban or rivaroxaban, concomitant use of diltiazem raised serious bleeding risk by 5.4 per 1000 person-years versus metoprolol.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: