Nascent blockchains—networks in their formative stages (0–3 years post-launch) with limited network participation and market capitalisation below 100 million—face disproportionate vulnerability to consensus-level attacks. While established blockchains, such as Bitcoin, require attack costs exceeding 6 billion, nascent chains can be compromised for 50, 000–1 million, creating a 3–4 orders of magnitude security gap. This systematic review examines the security vulnerabilities of nascent blockchains and evaluates consensus mechanisms and protection strategies for risk mitigation. We propose a five-stage blockchain lifecycle framework synthesising maturity concepts from the Government Blockchain Association’s Blockchain Maturity Model with network effects theory and attack economics. This framework characterises security evolution from genesis (extremely vulnerable) through growth (nascent period) to an established status (economically secure). Our analysis of 51% attacks documented between 2018 and 2024 validates this framework: 85% of successful attacks targeted blockchains in the nascent period, with an attack success rate of 80% compared to near zero for established networks. We present a comprehensive evaluation of Byzantine Fault Tolerance (BFT) hybrid consensus mechanisms, including Zilliqa, Algorand, Stellar, HotStuff, and ByzCoin, alongside novel protection mechanisms such as ChainLocks and checkpointing strategies. Comparative analysis reveals that BFT-based approaches offer significantly stronger security for nascent blockchains by requiring attackers to control 67% of network resources (versus 51% for traditional Proof-of-Work) and providing deterministic finality. Our findings demonstrate that multidimensional security thresholds combining computational, economic, and Byzantine fault tolerance provide robust protection during vulnerable early stages, with empirical evidence showing zero successful attacks against properly implemented BFT hybrid systems.
Sello et al. (Wed,) studied this question.