Post-disturbance recovery is a central element of forest resilience against intensifying disturbance regimes. Although recovery signals are strong across Central European forests, the relative roles of different factors contributing to recovery remain incompletely understood. As climate change increasingly challenges recovery, elucidating these processes is essential to adapt forest management to changing climate and disturbance regimes. We extended and applied a biologically grounded model of forest growth to remote sensing data to quantify how management shapes two key drivers of canopy recovery—disturbance legacies and post-disturbance height growth—across Bavaria, Germany. We combined 23,036 ha of quality-filtered photogrammetric canopy height model data with a Landsat-based disturbance map, a forest ownership map and environmental covariates in a Bayesian modelling framework. Post-disturbance growth rates were governed primarily by forest type and site conditions, whereas management strongly influenced disturbance legacies, i.e. the remaining post-disturbance vegetation height structure on site. Legacies varied widely across management types: Federal and set-aside forests retained the highest level of disturbance legacies, while private forests had the lowest legacy levels. Despite marginally lower growth rates, set-aside areas had recovery trajectories that were comparable to managed forests. The median recovery time to 5 m mean canopy height was 14.3 years over all forest and management types. Set-aside areas exhibited the greatest variation in recovery trajectories. We here show that (i) management affects disturbance legacies more strongly than post-disturbance tree growth, (ii) set-aside areas do not differ in recovery speed from managed areas, and (iii) legacies are diversifying forest recovery trajectories, with potential implications for future forest resilience. Our results underline that the post-disturbance reorganization window is a crucial period for management to influence long-term forest development. The framework presented here provides a scalable approach to monitor structural recovery and guide adaptive forest policy and management under increasing disturbance. • Forest management in Central Europe affects post-disturbance recovery more via legacies than tree growth rates. • Set-aside forests recover their canopy height equally fast as managed forests in Central Europe. • Homogenizing and removing disturbance legacies can reduce forest canopy variation across forest stand development. • We combined a biological growth model with remote sensing data to assess forest canopy recovery.
Krüger et al. (Wed,) studied this question.