Purpose This study aims to examine how auditors’ attitudes towards responsibility shape the possibilities for using artificial intelligence (AI) within the auditor risk assessment process (ARAP). Design/methodology/approach Using an affordance lens and abductive approach, the authors deconstruct human actions into avoidance and arrangement, applying these frameworks to structured interviews with auditors. Findings Possibilities are filtered through responsibility. Moreover, the authors identify a non-linear relationship between the attitudes towards responsibility and algorithms. Research limitations/implications The study focuses solely on the auditor’s perspective, while further research should include other stakeholders. The findings highlight a potential systemic policy risk should AI adoption challenges remain unaddressed. Originality/value By linking algorithm aversion to distributed responsibility, this study offers fresh insights into human–AI interactions and contributes to the understanding of barriers to AI adoption in professional services.
Staszkiewicz et al. (Thu,) studied this question.