Eye diseases, such as glaucoma, diabetic retinopathy, and age-related macular degeneration, drive the growing need for reliable and scalable analyses of fundus and optical coherence tomography (OCT) images. Deep learning performs strongly in ocular structure segmentation. However, it typically relies on dense pixel-wise annotations, which are costly and difficult to obtain at scale. Weakly supervised learning (WSL) can reduce this burden by leveraging coarse labels, limited strong annotations, and unlabeled data. This systematic umbrella review synthesizes survey and review articles on weakly supervised deep learning for image segmentation, with a focus on ocular imaging (fundus and OCT/OCTA). After analyzing twenty-one secondary studies, the main finding reveals an “empty intersection”: WSL-focused segmentation surveys are often modality-agnostic. Conversely, ocular reviews are predominantly fully supervised and seldom offer quantitative evidence on annotation-effort savings or direct comparisons between weak and fully supervised methods on identical datasets. Across the included reviews, label-efficient strategies cluster around CAM/MIL formulations, sparse supervision (points/scribbles/boxes), pseudo-labelling/self-training, and semi-/self-supervised learning, implemented mainly with U-Net/DeepLab families and increasingly Transformer or hybrid backbones. These results provide a structured map of available WSL mechanisms and, critically, identify reproducible reporting gaps that currently prevent fair benchmarking in ocular segmentation. Therefore, this review supports the development of ocular-specific benchmarks and minimum reporting practices that link segmentation performance to annotation effort.
Penedo et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: