The understanding and application of copyright law with regards to AI generated images has created significant challenges. China and the United States demonstrate that the judicial bodies of the two countries have distinct differences in their attitude towards copyright protection of AI generated material. The reason is that the generation process of artificial intelligence generator includes two stages of user input instruction and automatic generation of artificial intelligence program. The discussion focuses on the personalized characteristics of the instructions in the user input stage and the automatic characteristics stage, which will determine whether the artificial intelligence generated material can be protected by copyright. This paper argues that the neighboring rights approach can better integrate these two stages. By comparing the object of rights, the subject of rights, and the content of rights between AI generated works and existing neighboring rights, it can be found that AI generated works are in conformity with neighboring rights, which can resolve the dilemma of "either this or that" choice faced by the copyright approach. However, neighboring rights are typical statutory rights and need to be coordinated with the copyright protection of the existing works used by artificial intelligence. Whether it is necessary to legislate on neighboring rights for artificial intelligence generated works still awaits further observation over time.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Rong Han
Zhaoqing University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Rong Han (Thu,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69a287b00a974eb0d3c03a2d — DOI: https://doi.org/10.57237/j.ha.2026.01.001