This paper examines the evolving role of Islamic Mutual Funds “IMFs.” as strategic instruments for promoting inclusive and sustainable economic development during the period 2014–2024. Grounded in the ethical and moral framework of Shari‘ah, Islamic mutual funds have emerged as vital financial intermediaries that mobilize savings, enhance financial inclusion, and channel investments into productive, asset-backed sectors of the real economy. The study integrates both theoretical and empirical perspectives, linking the finance–growth nexus with Islamic principles of equity, transparency, and social justice. Empirical evidence indicates that global Islamic fund assets exceeded USD 250 billion by 2024, with the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries and Malaysia leading in innovation, regulatory advancement, and market integration. Case studies from these regions demonstrate that Islamic mutual funds have become key enablers of capital formation, infrastructure financing, SME development, and employment generation, thereby supporting Vision 2030 initiatives and the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs 8, 9, and 10). These funds not only provide competitive financial returns but also promote ethical governance, transparency, and resilience against speculative volatility. Despite this progress, the sector continues to face challenges such as regulatory fragmentation, limited market liquidity, and shortages in human capital with dual expertise in Shari‘ah and finance. To address these constraints, the paper proposes policy recommendations focused on regulatory harmonization, digital transformation, ESG integration, and professional capacity-building to strengthen the industry’s role in sustainable development. Ultimately, Islamic mutual funds demonstrate that profitability and social purpose can coexist within a framework of moral capitalism, offering a viable model for ethical financial intermediation in the twenty-first century.
Hallaq et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: