Purpose This viewpoint examines the critical role of trust, ethics and transparency in AI-driven learning organizations, exploring how algorithmic opacity and ethical ambiguity create barriers to organizational learning effectiveness. Design/methodology/approach Drawing on social cognition theory and organizational learning frameworks, this conceptual analysis illustrates how trust erosion in AI-mediated environments creates a cyclical pattern of resistance behavior that impedes knowledge sharing and collaborative learning processes. Findings AI systems’ lack of transparency generates interpretive uncertainty among employees, leading to skepticism, resistance behavior and the formation of negative cognitive schemas that hinder organizational learning cycles. Trust deficits compound these effects through reduced participation in AI-enabled training programs. Research limitations/implications As a conceptual viewpoint, this paper lacks empirical data, future studies (longitudinal surveys or field experiments manipulating transparency) should test the proposed cycle and cultural boundary conditions. Practical implications Organizations must establish transparent AI governance frameworks and ethical oversight mechanisms to build employee trust and maximize the effectiveness of AI-driven learning initiatives. Social implications Ethical AI implementation in learning organizations contributes to broader societal goals of responsible technology adoption and sustainable institutional development and can improve fairness in upskilling access. Originality/value This work uniquely integrates trust theory with AI governance frameworks to demonstrate how ethical transparency gaps create psychosocial barriers to learning, offering a novel perspective on human-AI interaction in organizational contexts. Unlike many AI-ethics models that prioritize technical compliance, this viewpoint emphasizes psychological pathways from opacity to employee learning behavior.
Vidya Bhegade (Tue,) studied this question.