In professional and interpersonal communication, an instrumental view of listening often dominates: listening as information acquisition and problem solving. In this article, I distinguish this mode of “listening to” from an existential mode that I call “listening with.” Listening to is a serious attempt to understand the Other as well as possible, but it carries a risk: the Other’s story is quickly absorbed into my own frame of reference, after which my response says more about me than about the Other. Listening with is not a superior technique, but an ethical attitude of availability and restraint: I stay with the Other’s appeal without wanting to possess, conclude, or repair him or her.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Corine Jansen
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Corine Jansen (Tue,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69a75abdc6e9836116a20f0c — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18390150