This study aimed to establish the concurrent validity and agreement of the K-power (KINVENT Biomecanique, Montpellier, France) hybrid sensor system that combines Ultra-Wideband and Inertial Measurement Unit measures against criterion timing gates for recording 20-m sprint performance in adolescent athletes. Fifteen trained adolescent track and field sprinters (age: 15.2 ± 2.4 years) performed two maximal 20-m sprints. Sprint times were simultaneously recorded using timing gates and the K-power sensor. Validity and agreement were assessed using paired-samples t-tests, Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICCs), Coefficient of Variation (CV), and Bland–Altman analysis. Sensitivity was determined by comparing the Typical Error (TE) to the Smallest Worthwhile Change (SWC). No significant systematic bias was observed between the devices (p > 0.05). The K-power sensor demonstrated excellent absolute agreement (ICC = 0.96, [95% CI = 0.94–0.98) and a low relative error (CV = 1.07%). The device displayed high sensitivity, with a TE (0.034 s) smaller than SWC (0.040 s). In conclusion, the K-power sensor is a valid and reliable instrument for measuring 20-m sprint times, being a practical alternative to timing gates. While the system is sensitive (TE < SWC), the Minimal Detectable Change of 0.094 s likely reflects the inherent biological variability of adolescent mechanics; thus, coaches should view changes exceeding 0.09 s as meaningful for individual athletes.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Vassilios Panoutsakopoulos
Emmanouil Athanasopoulos
Tong Li
Applied Sciences
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
Laboratoire de Biomécanique et Mécanique des Chocs
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Panoutsakopoulos et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69a75aefc6e9836116a21695 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app16031268
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: