Soil amendments are widely applied to improve soil fertility and structure, yet their performance in cold regions is constrained by low accumulated temperatures, frequent freeze–thaw (FT) cycles, and permafrost sensitivity. In this review, ‘cold regions’ refers to high-latitude and high-altitude areas characterized by long winters and seasonally frozen soils and/or permafrost. We screened the peer-reviewed literature using keyword-based searches supplemented by backward/forward citation tracking; studies were included when they assessed amendment treatments in cold region soils and reported measurable changes in physical, chemical, biological, or environmental indicators. Across organic, inorganic, biological, synthetic, and composite amendments, the most consistent benefits are improved aggregation and nutrient retention, stronger pH buffering, and the reduced mobility of potentially toxic elements. However, effectiveness is often site-specific and may be short-lived, and unintended risks—including greenhouse gas emissions, contaminant accumulation, and thermal disturbances—can offset gains. Cold-specific constraints are dominated by limited thermal regimes, FT disturbance, and the trade-off between surface warming for production and permafrost protection. We therefore propose integrated countermeasures: prescription-based amendment portfolios tailored to soils and seasons; the prioritization and screening of local resources; coupling with engineering and land surface strategies; a minimal cold region MRV loop; and the explicit balancing of agronomic benefits with environmental safeguards. These insights provide actionable pathways for sustainable agriculture and ecological restoration in cold regions under climate change.
Miao et al. (Wed,) studied this question.