Nothing will be the same: a comparative review of the scientific literature on remote work before and after COVID-19

Objective: The aim of this study is to analyze the evolution of the scientific literature on remote work by comparing the periods before and after the COVID-19 pandemic, to understand how the pandemic has reconfigured work dynamics and propelled research in new directions. Methodology: We employed a bibliometric approach, utilizing visual maps generated by VOSviewer based on data indexed in the Web of Science. This methodology allowed us to illustrate trends and paradigmatic changes in remote work research, providing a detailed comparative analysis of the two periods in question. Originality/Relevance: A theoretical gap related to understanding the transformations in remote work in response to the COVID-19 pandemic is adressed. The academic relevance lies in the need to comprehend these changes to guide future research and work practices. Results: The results indicate an exponential increase in the number of annual publications on remote work, as well as a shift in research focuses, evidencing an evolution in theoretical and practical approaches to the topic. Theoretical/Methodological Contributions: The study contributes to the existing literature by offering a comparative view of the evolution of research on remote work and highlighting how the COVID-19 pandemic served as a turning point in academic and professional discussions on the subject. Social/Management Contributions: The insights generated by this study have significant implications for researchers, practitioners, and policymakers, providing a solid foundation to navigate and shape the future of work in a digital and flexible context. It highlights the importance of adapting work practices to the new realities imposed by the pandemic.