Aim: This study analyzes the differences between pathohistological findings from prostate core biopsy and radical prostatectomy in patients with prostate cancer, with special emphasis on prostate volume, tumor involvement, Peri neural invasion (PNI), lymphatic and vascular emboli, and resection margin status. Methods: Twenty-one patients with adenocarcinoma of the prostate diagnosed by core needle biopsy, later subjected to radical prostatectomy, were included. Data from the biopsy and surgical specimen were compared. Statistical analysis was performed on the frequency of PNI in the biopsy and prostatectomy, the extent of tumor involvement (% involvement) in the final specimen, the presence of lympho vascular invasion, as well as the surgical margin status. Results: The mean age of patients was ~70 years, with a median prostate volume of 49 cc (range 28–80 cc). The average tumor involvement in the radical specimen was 14% (median 12%, range 3–30%). Peri neural invasion was observed in only 5 patients (23.8%) on biopsy, whereas in the prostatectomy specimen PNI was present in 16 patients (76.2%), a statistically significant increase (McNemar p < 0.01). Lymphatic and/or vascular tumor emboli were detected in 8 patients (38%) in the surgical specimen (7 cases only lymphatic, 7 cases only vascular, with 6 patients having both types of emboli). Positive resection margins (tumor at the cut surface) were found in 6 patients (28.6%). Conclusion: Pathohistological findings from radical prostatectomy often reveal a greater extent of disease than the initial biopsy. The biopsy has limited sensitivity for certain prognostic factors (such as PNI and lympho vascular invasion), which significantly influence subsequent treatment and prognosis. Detection of PNI, lymphatic/vascular invasions, and positive margins in the final specimen indicates a more aggressive disease and helps identify patients who require adjuvant therapy or more intensive monitoring.
Minev et al. (Tue,) studied this question.