What question did this study set out to answer?

This study critically examines the challenges of fluid resuscitation strategies in septic shock and proposes a novel personalized approach.

March 5, 2026Open Access

Rethinking Fluid Resuscitation in Septic Shock: A Phase-Adapted, Endothelium-Sparing Approach to Mitigate Capillary Leak

Key Points

This study critically examines the challenges of fluid resuscitation strategies in septic shock and proposes a novel personalized approach.
Reviewed existing literature and clinical trial evidence on fluid resuscitation in septic shock.
Proposed the Phase-Adapted, Endothelium-Sparing (PAES) resuscitation strategy.
Outlined the integration of biomarkers and dynamic monitoring for real-time guidance.
Highlighted limitations of crystalloid-dominant protocols in managing fluid resuscitation.
Found that tailored fluid type and volume improve macrohemodynamic stabilization while reducing microcirculatory injury.
Emphasized the benefits of using balanced crystalloids and albumin for specific high-risk groups.

Abstract

Abstract: Sepsis-induced endothelial dysfunction and the resultant capillary leak syndrome are defining features of septic shock, posing a profound challenge to conventional fluid resuscitation strategies. The long-standing debate over crystalloid versus colloid administration is evolving beyond a simple dichotomy toward a more nuanced, physiologically informed approach. This review critically examines the pathophysiological cascade driving vascular hyperpermeability in sepsis—from endothelial glycocalyx degradation and inflammatory cytokine storms to oxidative stress and nitric oxide dysregulation. We trace the evolution of resuscitation paradigms from early goal-directed therapy to modern conservative approaches, highlighting the limitations of crystalloid-dominant protocols, including intravascular volume depletion despite a positive fluid balance and iatrogenic organ injury. Drawing on evidence from landmark clinical trials (eg, ALBIOS, CRISTAL, SMART) and a pharmacological reappraisal of fluid properties, we argue that a one-size-fits-all strategy is obsolete. Instead, this narrative review synthesizes recent trial evidence and pathophysiological insights to propose the Phase-Adapted, Endothelium-Sparing (PAES) resuscitation strategy, a novel framework that tailors fluid type and volume to the distinct temporal phases of septic shock: Rescue, Optimization, Stabilization, and De-escalation. This model advocates for initial resuscitation with balanced crystalloids, followed by the judicious integration of albumin in specific, high-risk patient subgroups to leverage its unique oncotic and pleiotropic, endothelium-stabilizing effects. We further outline how dynamic hemodynamic monitoring, point-of-care ultrasound, and emerging biomarkers of endothelial injury (eg, syndecan-1, angiopoietin-2) can guide the real-time implementation of this personalized strategy. The PAES framework aims to uncouple macrohemodynamic stabilization from microcirculatory injury, offering a pragmatic pathway to optimize perfusion, mitigate capillary leak, and improve outcomes in this critically ill population. Keywords: personalized medicine, septic shock, fluid resuscitation, endothelial dysfunction, capillary leak syndrome

AIに質問

Bookmark

View Full Paper