In today’s performance-driven world, this study explores how competitive settings create complex limitations on human development. Grounded in Life History Theory, Social Comparison Theory, and the Theory of Planned Behavior, the research investigates the biological, psychological, and social processes that contribute to developmental stagnation. It focuses on how biological activation response (BAR) and perceived social competition (PSC) directly influence human development constraints (HDC) while also analyzing how revolutionary adaptability (RA) and social norm sensitivity (SNS) moderate these effects. Using a quantitative approach, the study collected 385 responses from students, professionals, and development specialists in Vietnam, Singapore, and Malaysia through stratified purposive sampling. The findings reveal that both BAR and PSC significantly intensify developmental barriers in highly competitive environments. Furthermore, RA helps mitigate the adverse effects of BAR, whereas SNS increases the harmful impact of PSC. These results challenge the common belief that competition inherently promotes growth, emphasizing instead how it can hinder development across biological, psychological, and social domains. The study suggests practical reforms, including adaptability training, personalized evaluation methods, and emotional resilience programs. It offers an innovative framework that enriches the understanding of competitive stress and provides valuable guidance for educators, policymakers, and mental health professionals aiming to support sustainable human development.
Vo et al. (Thu,) studied this question.