Abstract The Spanning Tree Protocol (STP), standardized in IEEE 802.1D, has served as the foundational loop-prevention mechanism in bridged Ethernet networks for over three decades. Despite its widespread adoption, STP exhibits significant limitations with respect to convergence time, bandwidth utilization, and scalability that are increasingly incompatible with the demands of modern enterprise and data center networks. This paper presents a structured comparative analysis of five major Layer 2 protocols in the STP lineage: STP (IEEE 802.1D), Rapid Spanning Tree Protocol (RSTP, IEEE 802.1w), Multiple Spanning Tree Protocol (MSTP, IEEE 802.1s), Shortest Path Bridging (SPB, IEEE 802.1aq), and Transparent Interconnection of Lots of Links (TRILL, RFC 6325). The analysis is conducted along four primary dimensions: convergence time, scalability, operational complexity, and security considerations. Drawing exclusively on peer-reviewed literature, IETF/IEEE standards, and published operational benchmarks, the paper concludes with a structured evaluation of the relevance of these protocols in Software-Defined Networking (SDN) environments and modern Ethernet fabric architectures, proposing a conceptual decision framework for protocol selection.
Adrian Tudoroiu (Mon,) studied this question.