Artificial-intelligence-driven wayside monitoring has become a promising solution for early identification of railway wheel flats, enabling safer operations and more efficient maintenance planning. This study introduces a comparative investigation of supervised and unsupervised machine learning strategies for wheel flat identification, with particular emphasis on real-time applicability and sensor cost reduction. Support Vector Machines (SVMs) and k-means clustering are evaluated as representative supervised and unsupervised approaches using vibration data obtained from numerically simulated train–track interactions under realistic operating conditions, including train speeds of 120 km/h and 200 km/h and multiple wheel flat severities. A key contribution of this work is the proposal of a simplified supervised classification framework that directly exploits Auto-Regressive features extracted from rail-mounted accelerometers, eliminating the need for feature normalization and multi-sensor data fusion. This simplification significantly reduces computational effort, making the approach suitable for real-time deployment in operational railway environments. In parallel, a systematic sensitivity analysis is conducted to assess the influence of sensor placement and to identify the minimum sensor configuration required to achieve reliable damage classification. The outputs from the current study show that an SVM emerges with more accurate defect classification than the k-means clustering, allowing a wayside system with fewer sensors.
Chegini et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: