What question did this study set out to answer?

The study aims to compare movement patterns and physical function among chronic low back pain patients, focusing on nociplastic versus nociceptive pain.

March 6, 20260 citationsOpen Access

View Full Paper

Comparing Movement Patterns and Physical Function Between Chronic Low Back Pain Patients With Nociplastic and Nociceptive Pain Categories.

EAErin S. Archibeck NHNicholas Harris PZPatricia Zheng

Key Points

The study aims to compare movement patterns and physical function among chronic low back pain patients, focusing on nociplastic versus nociceptive pain.
Participants classified into nociplastic and nociceptive pain categories
Assessments of perceived physical function using PROMIS-PF
Objective biomechanical measures evaluated post adjustment for age, sex, and BMI
Individuals with nociplastic pain reported lower perceived physical function
Objective biomechanical measures were not significantly predicted by pain category
Pain category was a significant predictor of perceived functional limitations.

Abstract

While individuals with nociplastic pain reported lower perceived physical function and exhibited differences in demographic and psychological factors, pain categories were not significant predictors of objective biomechanical measures after adjusting for age, sex, and BMI. However, pain category was a significant predictor of PROMIS-PF, suggesting that it is more closely associated with perceived functional limitations than with quantitative biomechanical performance.

اسأل الذكاء الاصطناعي

Bookmark

View Full Paper

اسأل الذكاء الاصطناعي

Bookmark

View Full Paper

Comparing Movement Patterns and Physical Function Between Chronic Low Back Pain Patients With Nociplastic and Nociceptive Pain Categories.

Key Points

Abstract

Cite This Study

Also Consider

Also Consider