This study investigated the relationship between Subsoil Geological Structure (SSGS) and the yield, berry composition, and wine attributes of Merlot grapevines in a mountainous region. The research found significant differences in vine physiology, yield, and berry chemistry of grapevines between five adjacent rows, which corresponded with the underlying SSGS. The middle row, planted over filling material and a karst layer, had the highest yield (1.96 kg·vine−1), consistent with better water availability, but produced berries and wine with the lowest concentrations of anthocyanins, phenolics, and soluble solids, resulting in the lowest wine quality score (82.33 points). In contrast, the northernmost row planted over bedrock had the lowest yield (0.12 kg·vine−1), consistent with limited water availability, but produced highly concentrated berries, though extreme stress compromised overall wine balance. The southern row, positioned over filling material on bedrock with moderate water stress (stem water potential −1.4 MPa), achieved an optimal balance between yield and quality, producing wine with the highest sensory score (88.78 points) and favorable chemical composition. Geophysical methods, including electric resistivity tomography (ERT) and ground-penetrating radar (GPR), identified the subsurface structure, revealing the karst layer beneath high-yielding rows and consolidated bedrock beneath severely stressed rows. Chemical analyses of berries and wine confirmed the dilution effect of higher water availability on quality-determining compounds, providing mechanistic evidence linking SSGS to wine quality. This study demonstrates the utility of integrating geophysical, physiological, and enological approaches for understanding terroir effects and optimizing vineyard management in complex geological settings.
Simhayov et al. (Mon,) studied this question.