Abstract Purpose To study risk factors for Nd:YAG capsulotomy (YAG-CT) due to visually disturbing posterior capsule opacification (PCO) after combined cataract surgery and vitrectomy, phaco-vitrectomy (PhV). Methods Single-center retrospective comparative cohort study. We included 196 patients (197 eyes) undergoing PhV. Electronic medical records provided baseline patient data, data on indication for vitrectomy, surgery data including intra-ocular lens (IOL) type, complications, and YAG-CT incidence during 6-year follow-up after PhV. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses assessed associations of various factors with YAG-CT incidence. Results Fifty-four eyes (27.41%) underwent YAG-CT during the follow-up period. One of the three hydrophilic acrylic IOLs showed the lowest YAG-CT incidence. Adjusted Odds Ratios (aORs) for YAG-CT were significantly higher for the hydrophobic acrylic IOL (aOR = 5.85, p < .05), and the two other hydrophilic acrylic IOLs (aOR = 29.0, p < 0.001 and aOR = 79.4, p < 0.001). Compared with PhV for macular hole, PhV for epiretinal membranes (aOR = 9.9, p < 0.01), retinal detachment (aOR = 25.4, p < 0.01), and silicon oil removal (aOR = 22.4, p < 0.05) correlated with higher YAG-CT incidence. Type 2 diabetes correlated with increased YAG-CT incidence (aOR = 6.7, p < 0.01). Conclusion IOL type is a key factor in development of visually disturbing PCO after phacovitrectomy. One hydrophilic acrylic IOL outperformed other examined IOLs in reducing YAG-CT incidence after PhV. Retinal disease, as well as type 2 diabetes, correlated with YAG-CT, and should motivate a choice of an IOL type associated with a low YAG-CT incidence for PhV.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Mieszko Lachota
Medical University of Warsaw
Agata Frajdenberg
Linköping University
Karolina Radl Steiner
Linköping University
International Ophthalmology
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Lachota et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69b3ac2b02a1e69014ccdaa2 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-026-04017-7