Unmanned aerial vehicle Synthetic Aperture Radar (UAV SAR) is inevitably affected by hardware performance and complex electromagnetic environments, resulting in noise in the radar echo signal. This causes image blurring and loss of detail, severely limiting the detection performance and imaging quality of UAV SAR. High-repetition-rate UAV SAR can achieve high signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), but the SAR data volume grows exponentially, posing a challenge for large-scale data processing. Furthermore, in the case of high repetition rate, downsampling methods are needed to reduce the amount of raw data, which leads to a decrease in the echo SNR, thus significantly affecting SAR image details. Existing SAR signal processing methods typically involve a series of processing steps on the raw echo data, such as azimuth and range direction processing. However, these traditional methods still have limitations in improving the SNR, especially in complex environments or when the target signal is weak, where their effectiveness is often unsatisfactory. To address these issues, this paper first analyzes the SNR gain in SAR echo data processing and proposes a phase-compensated parameter-adjusted Chebyshev filtering algorithm to improve the SNR of SAR echoes. The algorithm first utilizes azimuth Chebyshev filtering to avoid spectral aliasing during downsampling and fully leverages navigation information provided by the airborne platform to accurately compensate for phase changes between pulses. Then, it employs parameter-adjusted Chebyshev filtering and coherent superposition techniques to combine multiple adjacent pulses into a single pulse with a higher SNR. Finally, the enhanced pulses are combined into a new two-dimensional matrix for subsequent pulse compression and imaging processing. This method can improve the echo SNR while reducing the amount of echo data, minimizing the loss of the original echo SNR and reducing the memory footprint of subsequent imaging processing, thus effectively improving data processing efficiency. The effectiveness of the algorithm is verified through simulation and actual measurement data.
Wang et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: