What question did this study set out to answer?

The aim is to evaluate improvements in running economy using data driven shoe design compared to traditional models.

March 14, 2026Journal of sport and health science/Journal of Sport and Health Science0 citationsOpen Access

Data driven shoe design improves running economy beyond state-of-the-art Advanced Footwear Technology running shoes

JKJohn Kuzmeski MBMontgomery Bertschy LHLaura Healey

Key Points

The aim is to evaluate improvements in running economy using data driven shoe design compared to traditional models.
Compared a prototype AFT shoe against traditional and state-of-the-art models
Quantified running economy for 15 trained runners
Analyzed step parameters and contact time during running
Prototype shoe improved running economy by 3.15% to 3.62% compared to traditional shoes
All runners recorded their best performance in the prototype
The FR3 had a lower step frequency and longer contact time than certain models

Abstract

• A data driven prototype shoe improve running economy by ∼3.1% to ∼3.6% compared to state-of-the-art marathon shoes • Each of the 15 runners tested recorded their best running economy in the prototype shoes • These findings demonstrate that data driven shoe is a promising frontier in performance shoe design Advanced Footwear Technology (AFT) has enabled remarkable improvements in running performance over traditional marathon racing shoes. However, reported differences between state-of-the-art AFT models are small, and vary across individuals. To assess if the benefits of AFT have been fully realized or if further running economy improvements can be unlocked using modern computational design and optimization techniques, we compared a prototype AFT shoe developed using a data-driven computational design process (PUMA Fast-R 3; FR3) against its traditionally developed predecessor model and 2 other state-of-the-art AFT models. We quantified running economy (i.e., the rate of metabolic energy consumption while running at a specified speed) for 15 trained runners (11 males and 4 females) in this prototype AFT shoe and 3 commercially available AFT models: the PUMA Fast-R 2 (FR2), the Nike Alphafly 3 (NIKE), and the Adidas Adios Pro Evo 1 (ADI). Running economy in the FR3 was 3.15% ± 1.24%, 3.62% ± 1.25%, and 3.54% ± 1.16% (mean ± SD) better than in the FR2, NIKE, and ADI (all p < 0.001), respectively, and every individual performed best in the FR3 shoes. While step parameters were similar between FR3 and FR2, the FR3 had a lower step frequency than the ADI ( p = 0.013) and longer contact time than the NIKE and ADI (both p < 0.001). Our results suggest that shoes designed using computational design analysis from biomechanical data can improve running economy. This approach appears to be a promising frontier in performance running shoe design, offering potential for further improvements and personalized AFT models.

AIに質問

Bookmark

View Full Paper