Indonesia’s financial system is bank-centric, with banks managing approximately 78% of the nation’s financial assets; therefore, the effectiveness of monetary policy transmission depends on banks’ responsiveness to the central bank’s interest rate policy (the BI Rate). However, a policy-relevant anomaly persists: deposit rate pricing is more strongly anchored to the Deposit Insurance benchmark (IDIC Rate) than to the BI Rate. This study argues that this research is significant because it identifies a “Dual Benchmark System” that traditional single-anchor models fail to address, representing a critical friction in emerging market transmission. This study examines this dual-benchmark paradigm and the associated asymmetric risks using a panel VAR with a Generalized Impulse Response Function (GIRF) on quarterly data for 63 commercial banks from 2010 to 2024. The results indicate that IDIC Rate shocks have a larger and more persistent effect on deposit rates than BI Rate shocks, generating asymmetric transmission risks. This dominance creates a structural “price ceiling” that keeps funding costs high, ultimately raising lending rates for borrowers and distorting deposit growth rates. Furthermore, this analysis reveals that external policy signals are far more influential than internal financial performance. This suggests that under the Basel III framework and prevailing financial regulations, banks prioritize liquidity compliance and safety net protection over internal operational efficiency. Macroeconomic shocks remain weaker than policy shocks and dissipate more quickly. This finding reveals a potential systemic coordination risk, implying an urgent need for tighter policy coordination between the Central Bank and the IDIC to reduce structural frictions, maintain transmission effectiveness, and protect long-term financial stability.
Widiyanti et al. (Wed,) studied this question.