(Non-)Linear Temporality and the Migration Decision from a Life Course Perspective

The life course perspective proves to be beneficial in understanding complex social phenomena such as migration by highlighting the impact of past events on current decisions. However, its chronological and linear perception of time and the compartmentalisation of life experiences into discrete stages have been subject to criticism. Building on the argument of Neale (2020, Qualitative longitudinal research: Research methods . Bloomsbury Publishing) and Sánchez-Mira and Bernardi (2021, Longitudinal and Life Course Studies, 12 (1), 19–40) about the importance of integrating both linear and fluid perceptions of temporality in life course research, we argue that a purely linear perspective on time is insufficient for capturing the complexity of decision-making processes and their underlying motives. A comprehensive understanding of these processes requires considering both notions of time. To support this argument, we apply a biographical approach. By using narrative interviews, we analyse the life stories of interviewees, with a particular focus on the temporal dimensions of their narratives. The findings reveal a dual perception of time in how interviewees reflect on their migration decisions. While their narrated life stories follow a linear structure shaped by chronological stages and fixed societal expectations, a systematic reconstruction of their narratives reveals a more fluid, non-linear perception of time. Additionally, the motives behind their migration decisions highlight this non-linear temporality.