Delays in adjudicating administrative cases are due to many legislative and administrative reasons that affect the progress of adjudication procedures. The complexity of administrative laws and their ambiguous wording prolong the duration of adjudication. Laws may contain loopholes or ambiguities that oblige courts to conduct extensive interpretations or wait for legislative amendments to clarify certain legal points. The existence of multiple laws that pertain to more than one administrative body may contribute to slowing down procedures due to the different and multiple jurisdictions of the relevant bodies, which requires more time to determine responsibilities and adjudicate cases. Pressure on administrative courts also causes delays, as the high number of cases, given limited human and technical resources, may lead to an accumulation of cases and a delay in adjudication. Slow procedures in some relevant administrative bodies, such as delays in providing necessary documents or investigations, may also lead to delays in adjudicating cases. Poor coordination between administrative bodies and courts can also be a cause of these delays, as gaps or lack of coordination between various bodies can hinder the progress of the case. These legislative and administrative reasons combine to lead to slow adjudication of administrative cases, which affects justice. And the effectiveness of the judicial system. Therefore, in this research, we attempt to shed light on the legislative reasons in the first section, and the administrative reasons in the second section..
Falih et al. (Sun,) studied this question.