During the operation of nuclear power plants, nuclear fuel undergoes significant compositional changes. After several cycles of use, the fuel must be removed and stored. Currently, spent fuel is stored mainly in pools or casks, and it is necessary to demonstrate the subcriticality of these systems. Spent nuclear fuel has a complex composition, and because computational codes are typically validated using fresh-fuel experiments, subcriticality assessments are usually performed conservatively with fresh-fuel compositions. These approaches demonstrate subcriticality but are very conservative and can lead to storage system designs that are more expensive or have reduced capacity. This paper focuses on the validation of computational codes using nuclear power plant critical start-up tests (referred to as reactor criticals). These tests include spent fuel and are well documented, allowing them to serve as validation experiments. Codes validated using reactor criticals can be applied to systems containing spent fuel calculation if sufficient similarity is demonstrated. Similarity is evaluated using the SCALE TSUNAMI-IP module, which is widely used for this purpose. Based on a database containing dozens of reactor criticals and similarity analyses, we developed a methodology for demonstrating the subcriticality of spent-fuel storage systems.
Sikl et al. (Tue,) studied this question.