Ukraine’s prolonged war crisis creates critical mental health service gaps, with 9.6 million at risk yet 300 respondents using an 18-item structured feedback questionnaire. The model operationalised five self-reflection modules: Interpretation Module (transforming affect-laden memories into narrative), Existential Choice Module (diagnosing motivation across six bipolar continua with ambivalence validation), Integration Module (identifying war-specific place-identity using extended seven-type typology), Balance Module (assessing resources and “escape spheres” per Peseschkian’s model), and Adaptation Module (evaluating posttraumatic growth/depreciation co-existence). Over 95% of respondents reported new situation awareness; 97% identified place-identity awareness as most valuable outcome. Key innovation lied in integrating cross-cutting psychoeducation enabling cognitive reframing, symptom depathologisation, and secondary stress reduction. The model addresses critical wartime mental health gaps, combining clinical rigor with independent-use accessibility
Gordienko-Mitrofanova et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: