If you think about how most software systems are built today, they almost always rely on a single underlying model: one that was designed with a particular kind of environment in mind. That works well enough when things stay predictable, but real-world conditions rarely cooperate. This paper puts forward a multi-model hypothesis: the idea that a system becomes genuinely adaptive when it carries several models internally and knows which one to lean on depending on what it's dealing with at any given moment. The result is a system that handles variability more gracefully, without falling apart when assumptions break down. What's presented here is a conceptual starting point. The formal math, experimental testing, and deeper analysis are intentionally left for follow-up work.
Deokar et al. (Mon,) studied this question.