Physical constants such as the fine-structure constant α are conventionally treated as free parameters of nature — brute inputs whose values happen to permit a habitable universe. This paper argues for a different interpretation: dimension-less constants may be better understood as outputs of relational formation rather than as externally given inputs. Drawing on the relational-structural framework developed in Parts I–V of this series, constants are reinterpreted as frozen ratios of relational formation — global variables accessible across all domains of interaction because they express the coherence of the whole relational architecture. The fine-structure constant α serves as the paradigmatic case. On this view, its value is not best treated as a dial that was set from outside, but as the numerical residue of a structural result that was reached. The framework unifies the interpretation of constants across physics, ties them to the coherence measures Φ and αs introduced in earlier parts, and replaces fine-tuning arguments with a structural claim: the universe did not need to be configured to produce observers from outside itself; rather, in becoming structured, it arrived at the conditions under which observers became possible from within.
Malin Hess (Fri,) studied this question.