Maize–tropical grass intercropping has been adopted during the dry season as a strategy for soil cover; however, a knowledge gap remains regarding adequate nitrogen (N) supply and the efficiency of this system in degraded pasture areas. The objective of this study was to evaluate dry biomass, grain yield, and macronutrient concentrations in maize–tropical grass intercropping as a function of N rates applied as side-dressing in the dry season. The experimental design consisted of a randomized complete block design in a split-plot arrangement with four replications. Main plots comprised maize monoculture, maize intercropped with Urochloa ruziziensis (Congo grass), and maize intercropped with Megathyrsus maximus cv. Aruana (Aruana Guinea grass). Subplots consisted of N rates (0, 50, 100, and 150 kg ha−1). Maize–Aruana intercropping showed a positive linear response to N rates for grain yield; specifically, the nitrogen rate of 150 kg ha−1 resulted in a 71.71% increase in grain yield compared to the lack of nitrogen supply. Conversely, maize monoculture showed a negative linear response, where the highest N rate (150 kg ha−1) resulted in a 68.83% reduction in grain yield compared to the lack of nitrogen supply. Despite yield potential being capped by seasonal water deficits and frost events, the intercropping systems maintained essential growth dynamics. Aruana grass provided a protective effect for maize development under stress. The findings demonstrate that N side-dressing in the maize–Aruana intercropping system in a minimum of 71.83 kg ha−1 is an adequate strategy to enhance grain yield and biomass production.
Batista et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: