Abstract This survey provides an overview of the challenges of misspellings in natural language processing (NLP). Misspellings are ubiquitous in digital communication, and even if humans can generally interpret misspelt text, NLP models frequently struggle to handle it: this causes a decline in performance in common tasks like text classification and machine translation. In this paper, we reconstruct a history of misspellings as a scientific problem. We then discuss the latest advancements to address the challenge of misspellings in NLP. Main strategies to mitigate the effect of misspellings include data augmentation, double step, character-order agnostic, and tuple-based methods, among others. This survey also examines dedicated data challenges and competitions to spur progress in the field. Critical safety and ethical concerns are also examined, for example, the voluntary use of misspellings to inject malicious messages and hate speech on social networks. The survey also explores psycholinguistic perspectives on how humans process misspellings, potentially informing innovative computational techniques for text normalisation and representation. Additionally, the survey explores the challenges that misspellings pose in multilingual contexts. Finally, the misspelling-related challenges and opportunities associated with modern large language models are also analysed, including benchmarks, datasets and performances of the most prominent language models against misspellings. This survey provides a comprehensive review of recent research on misspellings and aims to serve as a valuable resource for researchers seeking to get up to speed on this problem within the rapidly evolving landscape of NLP.
Sperduti et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: