Purpose The purpose of this study is to compare lived recovery journeys in mental health with a recovery model. Design/methodology/approach Unstructured interviews with prompts were conducted with two individuals along with the lived experience of the researcher. The approach is autoethnographic and narrative. Findings The individuals followed recovery journeys after detention in secure psychiatric wards. Research limitations/implications This is a small-scale study. The results indicate it may be a useful research method elsewhere. Practical implications The study has relevance for clinical practice. Social implications The study highlights issues of social exclusion among those detained in secure mental health wards. The study gives voice to a marginalised community. Originality/value The interviewees and researcher have unique lived insight into forensic mental health care.
Andrew Voyce (Wed,) studied this question.