The smart city concept has become a dominant framework for contemporary urban governance, largely driven by advances in digital technologies and data-driven decision-making. However, the prevailing technocratic orientation of smart city development risks marginalising the sociopolitical dimensions of urban governance, particularly citizen and stakeholder participation. Although smart governance frameworks increasingly recognise participation as a normative principle, limited empirical attention has been paid to the participation motivators that drive engagement among different urban stakeholder groups. This study addresses this gap by analysing the key motivators influencing stakeholder participation in urban development within a smart city context. Building on established behavioural and participation theories, the article develops an Urban Participation Motivator Model comprising four core motivators: social pressure, emotional trigger, rational motivation, and reward for participation. The model is empirically tested using quantitative survey data from 620 respondents representing four stakeholder groups in Riga, Latvia: municipal residents, municipal employees, municipal politicians, and real estate developers. Data are analysed using descriptive statistics and non-parametric methods, including the Kruskal–Wallis test. The results reveal statistically significant differences in the perceived importance of participation motivators across stakeholder groups. Emotional triggers and social pressure emerge as the most influential motivators overall, while rational motivation is particularly salient for professional stakeholders. Reward for participation plays a weaker but differentiated role, being most relevant for municipal employees. These findings highlight the need for differentiated motivator-sensitive urban communication and participation strategies to enhance inclusiveness, democratic legitimacy, and long-term engagement in smart city development.
Minskere et al. (Thu,) studied this question.