"How can building materials be designed to minimize environmental harm if left behind after natural disasters? This question reflects a wicked problem because it extends beyond the physical destruction of buildings and into long-term social, ecological, and material consequences. Natural disasters leave behind large quantities of debris that contaminate soil, pollute waterways, harm wildlife, and create unsafe constitutions for affected communities and recovery workers. Toxic, non-renewable, or easily fragmented materials intensify pollution, while resilient, low-toxicity, and biodegradable options can reduce harm. Because rebuilding often happens quickly and under financial and policy constraints, the issue becomes deeply intertwined with questions of equity, access, and environmental responsibility.
Mackenzie Gordon (Mon,) studied this question.