This article introduces the term“pygmalionesque”to describe the patriarchal impulse to reshape women according to male ideals, as depicted in George Bernard Shaw’sPygmalion(1912) and Willy Russell’sEducating Rita(1980). The article situatespygmalionesquewithin linguistic neologism, blendingPygmalionwith the suffix-esqueto denote the aesthetic and coercive dimensions of patriarchal reform. Drawing on Ovid’s myth of Pygmalion and Galatea, the paper argues that both literary works critique the hierarchical dynamics of creator and creation, wherein male figures, Henry Higgins and Frank, respectively, attempt to mold the working-class women Eliza and Rita into refined embodiments of their own aspirations. Through textual analysis, it is demonstrated how these narratives expose the futility of such transformations: Eliza and Rita ultimately reject their Pygmalions’ visions, asserting agency over their identities. By interrogating the intersections of gender, class, and education, this study reveals how both plays subvert the myth’s traditional resolution, challenging the notion that women’s worth is contingent upon male validation. Ultimately,pygmalionesqueemerges as a framework for analysing systemic attempts to control female autonomy, while celebrating resistance to such impositions.
Yılmaz et al. (Sun,) studied this question.